Robert Parham, Executive Director of the Baptist Center for Ethics, who has closely monitored anti-public school sentiment in the Southern Baptist Convention, observes:
Of course, abandoning public schools will in fact abandon the biblically mandated responsibility to care for all God's children—the poor, the immigrant, the special-needs children.At a time when Southern Baptist leaders are blaming the free-fall in baptisms on family planning, it appears that Baptists are shifting their strategy for church growth from evangelism to education.
Abandoning public schools is really about retreating from the larger culture, from the public square, in order to "protect our own" from racial, religious, cultural and economic diversity. It's also about shielding children from science.
Nonetheless, Chapman's surprising move drew cheers from the extreme right, which has been calling for the exodus from public schools since 2004.
One of their leaders, Houston attorney Bruce Shortt, called Chapman's statement "the first step in the 'exit strategy.'"
"All Christians should note this sea-change in sentiment within the SBC," said Shortt. "The spiritual, moral and intellectual pathologies of the government school system are now obvious even to casual observers. Christian parents and pastors need to ask themselves just how much longer they intend to render our children to Caesar's spiritually dark, morally decaying and physically dangerous government schools."
After thirty years of fundamentalist dominion, the Southern Baptist Convention has become a by-word for the failure of theological hegemony and political activism as a means for sharing the gospel. Neither the affirmation of inerrancy, nor the purging of moderates from the convention, nor the alliance with a right-wing political movement, produced the growth that SBC fundamentalists promised.






2 comments:
I don't know what to say, all Jesus wanted us to do was love one another and treat others like we would like to be treated. Then man became involved and it was all down hill from there.
I believe that it comes down to a question of control by people like Moris Chapman. They send a message of fear regarding whatever is the fear of the day is and expect their followers to react. Thus securing their control over their followers. Look, their is nothing wrong with following what is suggested by one's religious leader, but it has to be grounded in some teaching of Christ. Many times these people bend and twist Christ's teachings to match their opinions to sway people and many have become lemmings and jump in the water with no critical thought and reasoning.
Post a Comment