If you put aside the emergency measures required by the financial crisis, three major policy ideas have dominated American politics in recent years: a plan that uses an individual mandate and tax subsidies to achieve near-universal health care; a cap-and-trade plan that attempts to raise the prices of environmental pollutants to better account for their costs; and bringing tax rates up from their Bush-era lows as part of a bid to reduce the deficit. In each case, the position that Obama and the Democrats have staked out is the very position that moderate Republicans have staked out before. . . .
The normal reason a party abandons its policy ideas is that those ideas fail in practice. But that's not the case here. These initiatives were wildly successful. Gov. Mitt Romney passed an individual mandate in Massachusetts and drove its number of uninsured below 5 percent. The Clean Air Act of 1990 solved the sulfur-dioxide problem. The 1990 budget deal helped cut the deficit and set the stage for a remarkable run of growth.
Rather, it appears that as Democrats moved to the right to pick up Republican votes, Republicans moved to the right to oppose Democratic proposals. As Gingrich's quote suggests, cap and trade didn't just have Republican support in the 1990s. John McCain included a cap-and-trade plan in his 2008 platform. The same goes for an individual mandate, which Grassley endorsed in June 2009 — mere months before he began calling the policy "unconstitutional."
It appears to me that one party is concerned about working for the common good and another party is concerned about working for the good of the party.
3 comments:
It seems to me that both are about working for the good of the party.
What is the point of moving to the right to "capture" Republican votes? It is to serve the party by getting it elected.
What is the point of moving further and further to the RIght to oppose the opposition party? It is to serve the party by differentiating it.
Neither party lives into the values that it espouses. Parties, by their nature, exist to serve themselves.
We live in strange times. The days of the moderate Republicans and Democrats who could work together are gone. Identifying and exploiting wedge issues are what sells now, especially on the GOP side.
I also wonder and worry about the effect of unrestricted corporate money is on the process, especially that given to unaffiliated third parties who are not held accountable for their ads and such.
"These initiatives were wildly successful. Gov. Mitt Romney passed an individual mandate in Massachusetts and drove its number of uninsured below 5 percent."
It also went over budget doing so by 50%. Not as wildly successful as you think.
Post a Comment