It's really interesting how convincing these arguments are when you approach them with an "open mind" (i.e., ignorance). I have no idea how they managed to build the Pyramids. If you take what they say at face value, it's easy enough to come away with the impression that they may have a point. I can't do that with the creationist arguments, since I know evolutionary theory far too well. Since most people know almost nothing about the science, I could see how they could come away thinking the "weaknesses" argument has merit.
Very enlightening. Very scary. But also very effective in getting the message across of what the IDists are doing.
3 comments:
It's really interesting how convincing these arguments are when you approach them with an "open mind" (i.e., ignorance). I have no idea how they managed to build the Pyramids. If you take what they say at face value, it's easy enough to come away with the impression that they may have a point. I can't do that with the creationist arguments, since I know evolutionary theory far too well. Since most people know almost nothing about the science, I could see how they could come away thinking the "weaknesses" argument has merit.
Very enlightening. Very scary. But also very effective in getting the message across of what the IDists are doing.
Scientists make faith statements all the time. No ridicule for them?
This is well done but it is scary also.
The creation science people are making inroads.
Post a Comment