Wednesday, January 31, 2007

On The Rise of American Fascists

I first learned about the work of Chris Hedges from Tom Boyd, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Oklahoma. Boyd, a Presbyterian minister, is one of the most highly and most widely respected educators in the state of Oklahoma. Years ago, he recommended Hedges book War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning. Naturally, with such a high recommendation, I read the book. I found it very insightful.

In that book Hedges, once a Christian seminary student, took an unflinching look at what he had observed and concluded while working as a reporter in war zones around the world.

Hedges latest book takes an unflinching look at what he observed and concluded while reporting on the Christian Right's culture war in America. This book is called American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America.

Here's a link to a short essay derived from the book. The essay comes from material in the last chapter of the book. It comes from the precise section where Hedges finally succeeded in convincing me that it is no longer a stretch to couple the word "fascist" with "Christian" when describing the Christian Right. Here's a quote:

[James Luther] Adams saw in the Christian right, long before we did, disturbing similarities with the German Christian Church and the Nazi Party, similarities that he said would, in the event of prolonged social instability or a national crisis, see American fascists rise under the guise of religion to dismantle the open society. He despaired of U.S. liberals, who, he said, as in Nazi Germany, mouthed silly platitudes about dialogue and inclusiveness that made them ineffectual and impotent. Liberals, he said, did not understand the power and allure of evil or the cold reality of how the world worked. The current hand-wringing by Democrats, with many asking how they can reach out to a movement whose leaders brand them "demonic" and "satanic," would not have surprised Adams. Like Bonhoeffer, he did not believe that those who would fight effectively in coming times of turmoil, a fight that for him was an integral part of the biblical message, would come from the church or the liberal, secular elite.

His critique of the prominent research universities, along with the media, was no less withering. These institutions, self-absorbed, compromised by their close relationship with government and corporations, given enough of the pie to be complacent, were unwilling to deal with the fundamental moral questions and inequities of the age. They had no stomach for a battle that might cost them their prestige and comfort. He told me, I suspect half in jest, that if the Nazis took over America "60 percent of the Harvard faculty would begin their lectures with the Nazi salute." But this too was not an abstraction. He had watched academics at the University of Heidelberg, including the philosopher Martin Heidegger, raise their arms stiffly to students before class.

Two decades later, even in the face of the growing reach of the Christian right, his prediction seems apocalyptic. And yet the powerbrokers in the Christian right have moved from the fringes of society to the floor of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Forty-five senators and 186 members of the House before the last elections earned approval ratings of 80 to100 percent from the three most influential Christian right advocacy groups -- the Christian Coalition, Eagle Forum, and Family Resource Council. President Bush has handed hundreds of millions of dollars in federal aid to these groups and dismantled federal programs in science, reproductive rights and AIDS research to pay homage to the pseudo-science and quackery of the Christian right. Bush will, I suspect, turn out to be no more than a weak transition figure, our version of Otto von Bismarck -- who also used "values" to energize his base at the end of the 19th century and launched "Kulturkampf," the word from which we get culture wars, against Catholics and Jews. Bismarck's attacks, which split Germany and made the discrediting of whole segments of the society an acceptable part of the civil discourse, paved the way for the Nazis' more virulent racism and repression.

Other recent writers have coupled the terms "fascist" and "Christian," but they did so cautiously and with reserve. Hedges does so boldly and with little reservations. His experience with the ideology, propaganda and the vortex of violence in bombed-over bullet-ridden war zones around the world gives his writing a sense of urgency that is lacking in the writings of others.

I recommed both of Hedges' books, but warn readers that they may find it hard to sleep soundly when they are finished.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Many people do not know that the term "Nazi" means "National Socialist German Workers' Party" and that members of the horrid group did not call themselves Nazis, but called themselves socialists.

The "Nazi salute" is more accurately called the "American salute" as it was created and popularized by national socialists in the USA where its use was mandated by law in government schools for three decades before, and through, the creation of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. It was the early gesture of the Pledge of Allegiance.
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html

The original pledge was anti libertarian and began with a military salute that then stretched out toward the flag. In actual use, the second part of the gesture was performed with a straight arm and palm down by children casually performing the forced ritual chanting. Due to the way that both gestures were used sequentially in the pledge, the military salute led to the Nazi salute. The Nazi salute is an extended military salute via the USA's pledge.

The Pledge's early salute caused quite a Fuhrer/furor. The dogma behind the Pledge was the same dogma that led to the socialist Wholecaust (of which the Holocaust was a part): 62 million slaughtered under the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; 49 million under the Peoples’ Republic of China; 21 million under the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. It was the worst slaughter of humanity ever.

The USA originated Nazism, Nazi salutes, flag fetishism, robotic group-chanting to flags, and the modern swastika symbol as S symbolism for "socialism," all shown in the research of the noted historian Dr. Rex Curry. The bizarre acts in the USA began as early as 1875 and continued through the creation of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German Nazis or NSGWP). American soldiers used the swastika symbol in WWI (against Germany) and perhaps as late as 1941. The NSGWP had clear roots in National Socialism promoted by socialists in the USA. Amazing graphic images that prove the point are at
http://rexcurry.net/theosophy-madame-blavatsky-theosophical-society.html

The USA is still the worst example in the world of bizarre laws that require robotic chanting to a national flag in government schools (socialist schools) every day for 12 years. It has changed generations of Americans from libertarians to authoritarians. The government bamboozled individuals into believing that robotic group-chanting in government schools is a beautiful expression of freedom. Frightening photographs are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html

enviroman said...

Chris Hedges is one of my heroes and one of the few to speak out forcefully against the war and the Christian fascists that are directing our foreign policy.
I would take issue,though, with his criticism of the Democrats and liberals for abandoning the working class. It is the farming and working class that abandoned the Democratic party once they attained middleclass status that is mainly responsible for the current dilemma. It is the present middle class who benefited from the New Deal and progressive programs that allowed them to climb out of poverty and acquire a remarkable degree of economic security and materialism.
The most fanatic fundamentalists are not reacting out of economic despair. That is nonsense. Most of them are very well off and even wealthy. Most of them are only one or two generations from the farm and a dirt poor existence and they credit God and their own hard work not progressive government policies. They would destroy the very programs that made their success possible. I know this first hand. Look at Frisco, TX. A wealthy Dallas exurb full of megachurches and Mercedes. They voted 80% for George Bush in the last election and would prefer a theocracy any day.
The only explanation that makes any sense to me is the appalling lack of a historical perspective and realistic understanding of the nature of man. This may be the results of a religious community that is willing to rewrite history and deny their own sorry history and an intellectual community that is afraid to point this out.

Jim Paslay said...

Yep, it those funny-damn-mentalists that are to blame for the rise of Hitler in Germany. And it is those patroitic conservatives that insist on pledging allegiance to the flag that is corrupting this country. Man, I didn't realize what an influence those funny-damn-mentalists had on the world. The next thing you know we will have a post that the funny-damn-mentalists were responsible for 9/11 in this country.

Liberals and moderates, you better take back this country from those funny-damn-mentalists or they will post 10 commandments in court houses, and they will expect the phrase "under God" to be in the pledge and they will support the troops with prayers instead of marches on Washington. They might even communicate with Americans that the Bible is God's Word and that it is truth without any mixture of error.

Sounds like a horrible place to live here in America. I bet people are just dying to leave this country on a daily basis, huh?