Thursday, February 09, 2006

Discrepancies in Gonzales Testimony Revealed

Buried in an article in today's Washington Post is information that indicates the testimony that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales gave the Senate Judiciary Committee conflicts with information given to the FISA court judges. Here's a quote:

Shortly after the warrantless eavesdropping program began, then-NSA Director Michael V. Hayden and Ashcroft made clear in private meetings that the president wanted to detect possible terrorist activity before another attack. They also made clear that, in such a broad hunt for suspicious patterns and activities, the government could never meet the FISA court's probable-cause requirement, government officials said.

So it confused the FISA court judges when, in their recent public defense of the program, Hayden and Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales insisted that NSA analysts do not listen to calls unless they have a reasonable belief that someone with a known link to terrorism is on one end of the call. At a hearing Monday, Gonzales told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the "reasonable belief" standard is merely the "probable cause" standard by another name.

It appears that the GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee had reasons for refusing to put Gonzales under oath. This administration is telling the gullible public one thing, and the FISA judges something else.

No comments: