The Mann report reads as if dictated by Cookie Monster while chewing on a mouthful of lead paint chips. Names of famous political figures and celebrities are chronically misspelled. PBS guests are categorized by labels--"anti-DeLay," "neutral," "x"--for often bewildering reasons. Mann appears to have spent endless hours monitoring programs with no political content, gathering such insights as that Ray Charles was blind.. . .Who is Fred Mann? For all we know, he could be a werewolf with supersensitive hearing that detects liberal bias inaudible to the average human's ear. But since he and Tomlinson have not provided the same level of accountability they are demanding from others, it is impossible to know. Reporters who have attempted to locate him, including NPR, have all failed. Perhaps only Van Helsing could uncover Mann's tracks. What is known is that in 1980, Mann worked on the senatorial campaign of Dan Quayle. Then, during Reagan's second term, Mann went to work at the Virginia-based National Journalism Center as its job bank and alumni director until he retired last year. The National Journalism Center is directed by M. Stanton Evans, a former editor of the conservative Indianapolis News, and a founder in 1960 of the right-wing youth group Young Americans for Freedom. Through the center, Evans nurtured movement activists like Mann and trained aspiring young media players, including Ann Coulter and Maggie Gallagher, the conservative Catholic columnist who took federal money from the Bush Administration to promote its policies.
Saturday, July 09, 2005
On Tomlinson's Secret Report
Kudos to Max Blumenthal for exposing the hack report by Fred Mann that Corporation for Public Broadcasting Chairman Kenneth Tomlinson used to hound Bill Moyers into retirement. In an essay entitled "M is for Moronic" posted by Nation Magazine, Blumenthal dissects the secret report about liberal bias at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Here are some quotes:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
David Brock's Blinded by the Right points out how fictitious most of the articles that the Right print are. But notice how sanctimonious they get when a Dan Rather or anyone else reporting about them makes a mistake on the facts. They do use quite a double standard.
Post a Comment