She does an outstanding job of reclaiming America's real religious history from the revisionists who want to make our country a theocracy. Here's an excerpt:
This country was not founded on a single religious viewpoint, as the far right would have it, but rather on a wide diversity of religious beliefs. The current far right believers are reminiscent of the Puritans who settled what would become Massachusetts and who established their religion as the religion of the colony (and then the state). The Puritans believed in the right to believe whatever one wanted, so long as dissenters left their cities and communities. They believed in a religious culture controlled by the majority. Rhode Island was founded because of the Puritans' rank intolerance.
Many of the dissenting Christians in Massachusetts were Baptists, whose charismatic preachers, including the Revs. Isaac Backus and John Leland, preached the separation of church and state. Backus declared that the "notion of a Christian commonwealth should be exploded forever" while Leland called established religions, "all of them, anti-Christocracies."
Yet, far right Christians today, many of them Baptists, have no respect for disestablishment principles. They are intent on removing barriers between government and religion, and, in fact, making government the servant to religion. They want their religious messages on courthouse walls, their theology in the science classrooms, their prayers in public schools, and their values to mandate constitutional policy. They even argue that Protestants are a majority and therefore have the right to have the government deliver their religious messages. This is their agenda for the next Supreme Court Justice.
5 comments:
Anon,
It is obvious to me that you don't know Bruce personally. He speaks the truth. Perhaps one day the scales will fall off your eyes as well...just like his in days gone by. He hasn't always been a "mainstream" Baptist. I'd venture to say he was, at one time, more rightwinged than you.
you can always tell that someone does good work, because someone is going to get angry about it.
all this man is doing is standing up to what he believes are historic baptist principles, and cites evidence to back himself up.
it's a blog, not a dissertation, i'm not expecting hugh amounts of research, just a jib on a topic that gives me a new subject or author to google.
furthermore, the anti-christian rhetoric that christianity is under attack (in part utilized by one poster) is a frequent tactic of "backlash" theorists,
try read, "What's the matter with Kansas?" it discusses theocrats and the like, but the author doesn't have a baptist background, he just writes what he sees.
mt1,
I suggest that you read the description of the blog that is the top of each page.
I also sign my full, real name to everything I write.
Anonymous,
Commenting on your comments has been very theraputic for me. God bless you and good luck on your new job search "down south". Perhaps one day we'll cross paths... you know my name.. so it will be up to you to intoduce yourself. Shalom.
Post a Comment